On Mon, Nov 24, 2025 at 07:16:11PM +0100, Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli wrote: > The GPL-2.1 isn't a valid license. > > The copyright header says that "These tests adapted from glibc's > string/test-strncat.c" and test-strncat.c is under the LGPL-2.1+. > > This was reported to us by Leah Rowe. > > Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <[email protected]> > --- > test/lib/strlcat.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/test/lib/strlcat.c b/test/lib/strlcat.c > index d1a0293271b..70982d5cd68 100644 > --- a/test/lib/strlcat.c > +++ b/test/lib/strlcat.c > @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ > -// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.1+ > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: LGPL-2.1+
Thanks for the report and confirmation on what's correct. Can you please use the "or-later" syntax and not the deprecated "+" syntax on the tag? -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
