On Tue, Jan 06, 2026 at 09:58:30AM +0900, Daniel Palmer wrote: > Hi Tom, Simon, > > On Tue, 6 Jan 2026 at 08:47, Tom Rini <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jan 05, 2026 at 04:30:26PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > > > Hi Kuan-Wei, > > > > > > > You can package your own devicetree in the U-Boot source, to handle > > > what you need. > > > > That's not helpful feedback here, the correct path is to use the machine > > as QEMU provides it and not start yet another pointless argument with > > QEMU. And this probably applies to some of your other feedback as well, > > thanks. > > > > -- > > Tom > > My version of this converts the bootinfo from QEMU to a devicetree > inside of u-boot and then u-boot uses that going forward. > I have suggested to the m68k kernel side that we allow bootinfo to > pass a devicetree pointer and/or use embedded devicetrees in the > kernel selected by the machine type in the bootinfo. > > My plan is once this very basic part is merged I will rebase my stuff > onto this and then start spamming Kuan-Wei with patches to add in > devicetree etc. ;)
Getting all of the other parts of the system in agreement and then doing that sounds like a good plan to me, thanks! -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
