On 1/6/26 23:42, Sean Anderson wrote:
Although the pinctrl pm requests are implemented in the PMU firmware,
PM_QUERY_DATA is actually implemented in ATF. In SPL (or when running in
EL3), ATF is not yet running, so we need to implement this API
ourselves. Do the bare minimum, allowing SPL to enumerate functions, but
don't bother with groups. Groups take up a lot of space, and can be
emulated with pins. For example, a node like

        display-port {
                mux {
                        groups = "dpaux0_1";
                        function = "dpaux0";
                };
        };

can be replaced by

        display-port {
                mux {
                        pins = "MIO34", "MIO35", "MIO36", "MIO37";
                        function = "dpaux0";
                };
        };

While this isn't backwards-compatible with existing devicetrees, it's
more than enough for SPL where we may only need to mux one or two pins.

Signed-off-by: Sean Anderson <[email protected]>
---

  drivers/firmware/firmware-zynqmp.c | 100 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  1 file changed, 100 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/firmware/firmware-zynqmp.c 
b/drivers/firmware/firmware-zynqmp.c
index f8a9945c1da..77911757177 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/firmware-zynqmp.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/firmware-zynqmp.c
@@ -427,6 +427,102 @@ U_BOOT_DRIVER(zynqmp_power) = {
  };
  #endif
+static const char *const pinctrl_functions[] = {
+       "can0",
+       "can1",
+       "ethernet0",
+       "ethernet1",
+       "ethernet2",
+       "ethernet3",
+       "gemtsu0",
+       "gpio0",
+       "i2c0",
+       "i2c1",
+       "mdio0",
+       "mdio1",
+       "mdio2",
+       "mdio3",
+       "qspi0",
+       "qspi_fbclk",
+       "qspi_ss",
+       "spi0",
+       "spi1",
+       "spi0_ss",
+       "spi1_ss",
+       "sdio0",
+       "sdio0_pc",
+       "sdio0_cd",
+       "sdio0_wp",
+       "sdio1",
+       "sdio1_pc",
+       "sdio1_cd",
+       "sdio1_wp",
+       "nand0",
+       "nand0_ce",
+       "nand0_rb",
+       "nand0_dqs",
+       "ttc0_clk",
+       "ttc0_wav",
+       "ttc1_clk",
+       "ttc1_wav",
+       "ttc2_clk",
+       "ttc2_wav",
+       "ttc3_clk",
+       "ttc3_wav",
+       "uart0",
+       "uart1",
+       "usb0",
+       "usb1",
+       "swdt0_clk",
+       "swdt0_rst",
+       "swdt1_clk",
+       "swdt1_rst",
+       "pmu0",
+       "pcie0",
+       "csu0",
+       "dpaux0",
+       "pjtag0",
+       "trace0",
+       "trace0_clk",
+       "testscan0",
+};
+
+/*
+ * PM_QUERY_DATA is implemented by ATF and not the PMU firmware, so we have to
+ * emulate it in SPL. Just implement functions/pins since the groups take up a
+ * lot of rodata and are mostly superfluous.
+ */
+static int zynqmp_pm_query_data(enum pm_query_id qid, u32 arg1, u32 arg2,
+                               u32 *ret_payload)
+{
+       switch (qid) {
+       case PM_QID_PINCTRL_GET_NUM_PINS:
+               ret_payload[1] = 78;

Macro for this value please.

+               ret_payload[0] = 0;
+               return 0;
+       case PM_QID_PINCTRL_GET_NUM_FUNCTIONS:
+               ret_payload[1] = ARRAY_SIZE(pinctrl_functions);
+               ret_payload[0] = 0;
+               return 0;
+       case PM_QID_PINCTRL_GET_NUM_FUNCTION_GROUPS:
+               ret_payload[1] = 0;
+               ret_payload[0] = 0;
+               return 0;
+       case PM_QID_PINCTRL_GET_FUNCTION_NAME:
+               memset(ret_payload, 0, 16);

Where is this 16 coming from? I expect this is max number of chars of function.


+               strcpy((char *)ret_payload, pinctrl_functions[arg1]);

you should check that arg1 is between 0 and array size not to read value behind.


+               return 0;
+       case PM_QID_PINCTRL_GET_FUNCTION_GROUPS:
+       case PM_QID_PINCTRL_GET_PIN_GROUPS:
+               memset(ret_payload + 1, 0xff, 12);

Where is this 12 coming from? Macro for it.


+               ret_payload[0] = 0;
+               return 0;
+       default:
+               ret_payload[0] = 1;
+               return 1;
+       }
+}
+
  smc_call_handler_t __data smc_call_handler;
static int smc_call_legacy(u32 api_id, u32 arg0, u32 arg1, u32 arg2,
@@ -493,6 +589,10 @@ int __maybe_unused xilinx_pm_request(u32 api_id, u32 arg0, 
u32 arg1, u32 arg2,
              __func__, current_el(), api_id, arg0, arg1, arg2, arg3, arg4, 
arg5);
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_XPL_BUILD) || current_el() == 3) {
+               if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_ZYNQMP) &&
+                   IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PINCTRL_ZYNQMP) &&

This logic have to change a little bit.
There is also CONFIG_SPL_PINCTRL symbol which likely needs to be enabled. But if it is not still this code ends in SPL and just extend binary.

Don't think you want to support running U-Boot out of EL3 but if yes that logic should be adjusted in connection to CONFIG_SPL_PINCTRL.




+                   api_id == PM_QUERY_DATA)
+                       return zynqmp_pm_query_data(arg0, arg1, arg2, 
ret_payload);
  #if defined(CONFIG_ZYNQMP_IPI)
                /*
                 * Use fixed payload and arg size as the EL2 call. The firmware

M

Reply via email to