On Wed, Jan 28, 2026 at 1:47 PM Tom Rini <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Mon, Jan 26, 2026 at 10:11:20AM +0800, Peng Fan wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 22, 2026 at 10:12:36AM -0300, Mateus Lima wrote:
> > >On Wed, Jan 21, 2026 at 11:13 PM Peng Fan <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > >> On Tue, Jan 13, 2026 at 11:23:01AM -0300, Mateus Lima Alves wrote:
> > >> >This patch adds CPLD support via IFC to the ls1021a-iot board.
> > >> >
> > >> >Signed-off-by: Mateus Lima Alves <[email protected]>
> > >>
> > >> CI report build failure.
> > >>
> > >>   CC      drivers/video/hitachi-tx10d07vm0baa.o
> > >> In file included from drivers/misc/fsl_ifc.c:8:
> > >> include/fsl_ifc.h:16:10: fatal error: asm/ppc.h: No such file or
> directory
> > >>    16 | #include <asm/ppc.h>
> > >>       |          ^~~~~~~~~~~
> > >> compilation terminated.
> > >> make[3]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:271: drivers/misc/fsl_ifc.o]
> Error 1
> > >> make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:492: drivers/misc] Error 2
> > >> make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
> > >>   CC      drivers/rtc/ht1380.o
> > >>   CC      drivers/video/hitachi_tx18d42vm_lcd.o
> > >>   CC      drivers/rtc/i2c_rtc_emul.o
> > >>
> > >> make[1]: *** [Makefile:2191: drivers] Error 2
> > >> make: *** [Makefile:362: __build_one_by_one] Error 2
> > >> Cleaning up project directory and file based variables
> > >>
> > >> Regards
> > >> Peng
> > >>
> > >Hi Peng,
> > >
> > >Thank you for the test, and apologies for not having validated the
> patch on
> > >other targets.
> > >In fact, this driver was not being used by any target (neither ARM nor
> PPC)
> > >and after this patch it became enabled again. However, PPC targets fail
> > >when trying to include the asm/ppc.h header, which is not available for
> > >some reason.
> > >
> > >For now, I am thinking of submitting a v3 of the patch adding an
> explicit
> > >dependency on ARM, something like:
> > >
> > >+ depends on ARM
> > >
> > >This way we would avoid building the driver for PPC targets.
> > >What do you think about this approach?
> >
> > It should be ok.
>
> This has lead to:
> WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for FSL_IFC
>   Depends on [n]: ARM [=n]
>   Selected by [y]:
>   - ARCH_P1010 [=y] && PPC [=y] && MPC85xx [=y]
>
> WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for FSL_IFC
>   Depends on [n]: ARM [=n]
>   Selected by [y]:
>   - ARCH_P1010 [=y] && PPC [=y] && MPC85xx [=y]
>
> For example on P1010RDB-PB_SPIFLASH.
>
> --
> Tom
>
Hi Tom,

Yes, I noticed that this warning is appearing now, and before this patch,
neither this flag nor fsl_ifc were properly used for compiling PPC targets.
Now that I've added more information about this option, it's being
considered again during compilation.

But in this thread, I commented to Peng Fan that it was possible to build
for PPC targets, meaning we wouldn't need to restrict this to ARM targets,
but I don't know what setup was used to crash the mentioned PPC target, but
in the U-Boot Azure DevOps environment, all targets were built successfully.

https://dev.azure.com/u-boot/u-boot/_build/results?buildId=12700&view=results

We can use patch v2 in this case, or could Peng Fan please show me how he
made his build break? Is it a different environment?

BR,
Mateus

Reply via email to