Hi Marek,

On Tue Jan 27, 2026 at 10:15 PM CET, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 1/27/26 12:03 PM, Markus Schneider-Pargmann (TI.com) wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>> +static int ti_musb_host_bind(struct udevice *dev)
>> +{
>> +    enum usb_dr_mode dr_mode = usb_get_dr_mode(dev_ofnode(dev));
>> +
>> +    if (dr_mode != USB_DR_MODE_HOST && dr_mode != USB_DR_MODE_OTG)
>> +            return -ENODEV;
>> +
>> +    return 0;
>> +}
>
> [...]
>
>>   #if CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(OF_CONTROL)
>> +static int ti_musb_peripheral_bind(struct udevice *dev)
>> +{
>> +    enum usb_dr_mode dr_mode = usb_get_dr_mode(dev_ofnode(dev));
>> +
>> +    if (dr_mode != USB_DR_MODE_PERIPHERAL)
>> +            return -ENODEV;
> How do you handle USB_DR_MODE_UNKNOWN , host or peripheral ?

Thanks for seeing this, I checked, USB_DR_MODE_UNKNOWN will result in
none of the drivers binding. That's the same behavior as the previous
wrapper:

        static int ti_musb_wrapper_bind(struct udevice *parent)
        {
                [...]
                        switch (dr_mode) {
                        case USB_DR_MODE_PERIPHERAL:
                                [...]
                                break;
                        case USB_DR_MODE_HOST:
                                [...]
                                break;
                        default:
                                break;
                        };
                }
                return 0;
        }

Thanks for reviewing the patches.

Best
Markus

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to