On Wed, Feb 04, 2026 at 03:48:17PM +0100, Frank Wunderlich wrote:
> Am 4. Februar 2026 14:53:38 MEZ schrieb Tom Rini <[email protected]>:
> >On Wed, Feb 04, 2026 at 07:40:05AM +0100, Frank Wunderlich wrote:
> >> Am 4. Februar 2026 00:34:02 MEZ schrieb Tom Rini <[email protected]>:
> >> >On Sun, Jan 25, 2026 at 02:12:52PM +0100, Frank Wunderlich wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> From: Frank Wunderlich <[email protected]>
> >> >> 
> >> >> Add a test for memsize command in same way as meminfo.
> >> >> 
> >> >> Signed-off-by: Frank Wunderlich <[email protected]>
> >> >> ---
> >> >> tested via:
> >> >> $ ./u-boot -T -c "ut cmd cmd_test_memsize"
> >> >> ...
> >> >> Test: memsize: meminfo.c
> >> >> Tests run: 1, 0 ms, average: 0 ms, failures: 0
> >> >> ---
> >> >>  cmd/Kconfig        |  1 +
> >> >>  test/cmd/meminfo.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> >> >>  2 files changed, 18 insertions(+)
> >> >> 
> >> >> diff --git a/cmd/Kconfig b/cmd/Kconfig
> >> >> index be79bf0747df..2bafa156ca8a 100644
> >> >> --- a/cmd/Kconfig
> >> >> +++ b/cmd/Kconfig
> >> >> @@ -927,6 +927,7 @@ config CMD_MEMINFO_MAP
> >> >>  
> >> >>  config CMD_MEMSIZE
> >> >>         bool "memsize"
> >> >> +       default y if SANDBOX
> >> >>         depends on CMD_MEMINFO
> >> >>         help
> >> >>           Get RAM via command for use in scripts.
> >> >> diff --git a/test/cmd/meminfo.c b/test/cmd/meminfo.c
> >> >> index 53b41e3b49e0..ba772a8b7616 100644
> >> >> --- a/test/cmd/meminfo.c
> >> >> +++ b/test/cmd/meminfo.c
> >> >> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
> >> >>   */
> >> >>  
> >> >>  #include <dm/test.h>
> >> >> +#include <env.h>
> >> >>  #include <test/cmd.h>
> >> >>  #include <test/ut.h>
> >> >>  
> >> >> @@ -39,4 +40,20 @@ static int cmd_test_meminfo(struct unit_test_state 
> >> >> *uts)
> >> >>  
> >> >>         return 0;
> >> >>  }
> >> >> +
> >> >> +/* Test 'memsize' command */
> >> >> +static int cmd_test_memsize(struct unit_test_state *uts)
> >> >> +{
> >> >> +       ut_assertok(run_command("memsize", 0));
> >> >> +       ut_assert_nextline("256 MiB");
> >> >> +       ut_assert_console_end();
> >> >> +
> >> >> +       ut_assertok(run_command("memsize memsz", 0));
> >> >> +       ut_asserteq_str("256", env_get("memsz"));
> >> >> +       ut_assert_console_end();
> >> >> +
> >> >> +       return 0;
> >> >> +}
> >> >> +
> >> >>  CMD_TEST(cmd_test_meminfo, UTF_CONSOLE);
> >> >> +CMD_TEST(cmd_test_memsize, UTF_CONSOLE);
> >> >
> >> >Since the new test isn't guarded with memsize, this fails on qemu-x86_64
> >> >where meminfo is enabled, but memsize is not.
> >> 
> >> Does x86_64 test not use SANDBOX? Do i need to enable it somewhere else? 
> >> Imho it should ve tested also there so guarding just prevents the test. 
> >> But of course i can add guards for it.
> >
> >No, it's qemu-x86_64 which is a different board :)
> 
> Ah ok,thought it is a platform test :)
> Then i add only config-guards.
> 
> Should it send full series with the requested changes (squashed) or an update 
> (afair you have already applied to next/master)?

Please send a v7 that include this fix in this patch, I didn't apply it
to master because it caused CI to fail :)

-- 
Tom

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to