Dear Graeme Russ, In message <calbutcj8f+sw-gbg0khby2aufcj30j1jq-xvxknzfmtqbxw...@mail.gmail.com> you wrote: > > > Actually I do not want to make this a requirement. =A0If we have a large > > patch series, and there are changes requested to only one or two of > > the patches, it is much more efficient to repost just these instead > > always the whole stack again and again. > > But this makes a royal mess of the series, especially in patchwork > which does not honor in-reply-to: and has been known to not pick up > patches. How do we definitively know we have the latest version of > *every* patch in the series? It is easy to tell when one has a > different version.
I'm afraid there is no other way than always checking your whoile mail archive. SO far I haven;t found any better method that even halfay reliably does things right automatically. > You're not worried about your latest series are you ;) No. I repeated the recommendation above a number of times in the past (last time I can remember was when Holger Brunck asked if he has to resind the whole series, and I say this was not needed). Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de Of all the things I've lost, I miss my mind the most. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
