On 3/9/26 7:50 AM, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: > On 3/6/26 20:52, David Lechner wrote: >> Fix 4 instances in buildman.rst where examples were missing :: for >> proper formatting. Three cases just had a single : and in one case, >> : didn't make grammatical sense, so it gets a stand-alone :: along >> with fixing the indent. >> >> Signed-off-by: David Lechner <[email protected]> >> --- >> tools/buildman/buildman.rst | 16 +++++++++------- >> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/tools/buildman/buildman.rst b/tools/buildman/buildman.rst >> index 9e850b26ec0..a2061715788 100644 >> --- a/tools/buildman/buildman.rst >> +++ b/tools/buildman/buildman.rst >> @@ -146,7 +146,7 @@ the '&' operator to limit the selection: >> - 'freescale & arm sandbox' - all Freescale boards with ARM architecture, >> plus >> sandbox >> -You can also use -x to specifically exclude some boards. For example: >> +You can also use -x to specifically exclude some boards. For example:: >> buildman arm -x nvidia,freescale,.*ball$ >> @@ -970,10 +970,12 @@ a set of (tag, value) pairs. >> settings file. They can also be useful when building U-Boot against >> other >> open source software. >> - [make-flags] >> - at91-boards=ENABLE_AT91_TEST=1 >> - snapper9260=${at91-boards} BUILD_TAG=442 >> - snapper9g45=${at91-boards} BUILD_TAG=443 >> + :: > > Thank you for addressing the documentation issues. > > In the documentation we tend to prefer syntax-highlighting.
I used :: to be consistent with the rest of the file. Should I change the entire file to .. code-block:: ? > > .. code-block:: ini >
