Re: [PATCH] s5p4418_nanopi2: Drop unnecessary BOARD_EARLY_INIT_F usage

[Stefan Bosch]

Hi Tom,

thank you for the patch. You are right, board_early_init_f can be 
removed. But where is CONFIG_BOARD_EARLY_INIT_F enabled, I didn't found 
it. Have I missed something?

Regards
Stefan

On 25.03.26 20:00, Tom Rini wrote:
This platform enables CONFIG_BOARD_EARLY_INIT_F and then has a
do-nothing board_early_init_f function. Change to not enabling the
option and so not needing an empty function. >
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com>
---
Cc: Stefan Bosch <stefa...@posteo.net>
---
  board/friendlyarm/nanopi2/board.c | 5 -----
  1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/board/friendlyarm/nanopi2/board.c 
b/board/friendlyarm/nanopi2/board.c
index 4dff32e10d6b..ca8ae529ddf4 100644
--- a/board/friendlyarm/nanopi2/board.c
+++ b/board/friendlyarm/nanopi2/board.c
@@ -406,11 +406,6 @@ __exit:
   * call from u-boot
   */
  
-int board_early_init_f(void)
-{
-       return 0;
-}
-
  int board_init(void)
  {
        bd_hwrev_init();