Hi Philippe, On 2026-03-31T10:00:34, Philippe Reynes <[email protected]> wrote: > diff --git a/test/dm/ecdsa.c b/test/dm/ecdsa.c > @@ -9,29 +9,15 @@ static int dm_test_ecdsa_verify(struct unit_test_state *uts) > - ut_asserteq(-ENODEV, ecdsa_verify(&info, NULL, 0, NULL, 0));
With the software ECDSA driver now available, this test would no longer return -ENODEV. Rather than just removing this assertion, could the test call ecdsa_verify() with valid test data and check for success? A DM test that exercises the full ecdsa_verify() path would be useful to ensure the driver binding works correctly. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <[email protected]> Regards, Simon
