On Mon, 27 Apr 2026 14:56:10 +0530, Balaji Selvanathan <[email protected]> wrote: > diff --git a/drivers/ufs/ufs-qcom.c b/drivers/ufs/ufs-qcom.c > index dc40ee62daf..ae33f62fbee 100644 > --- a/drivers/ufs/ufs-qcom.c > +++ b/drivers/ufs/ufs-qcom.c > @@ -557,10 +547,45 @@ static void ufs_qcom_dev_ref_clk_ctrl(struct ufs_hba > *hba, bool enable) > [ ... skip 20 lines ... ] > + > + rate = clk_set_rate(&clk, max_freq); > + if (rate < 0) { > + dev_err(dev, "Failed to set core_clk_unipro rate to %u Hz: > %ld\n", > + max_freq, rate); > + }
Was it intentional to proceed with init despite core clock set_rate failure? -- Neha Malcom Francis <[email protected]>
