On 5/13/26 3:33 PM, Pranav Tilak wrote:
When both CONFIG_PHY_ETHERNET_ID and CONFIG_DM_ETH_PHY are enabled,
eth_phy_binds_nodes() called from eth_post_bind() already binds the
ethernet PHY node to eth_phy_generic_drv. However, phy_connect_phy_id()
called via phy_connect() also binds the same PHY node, resulting in
duplicate entries in the DM tree.

Fix this by checking at the beginning of phy_connect() whether the PHY
is already bound via uclass_find_device_by_phandle(). If so, skip all
generic binding methods and fall through to phy_find_by_mask(). Also
assign phydev->node from the already bound DM device.

Fixes: 68a4d1506109 ("net: phy: Bind ETH_PHY uclass driver to each new PHY")
Signed-off-by: Pranav Tilak <[email protected]>
---
Changes in v5:
- Use int ret instead of bool phy_bound and goto out

Changes in v4:
- Removed IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DM_ETH_PHY), use runtime check via
   uclass_find_device_by_phandle()
- Fix indentation of binding methods block
- Assign phydev->node from the bound DM device's ofnode

Changes in v3:
- Moved duplicate binding check to beginning of phy_connect()

Changes in v2:
- Move duplicate binding check to caller phy_connect()
- Update commit description
---
  drivers/net/phy/phy.c | 13 +++++++++++++
  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/phy.c b/drivers/net/phy/phy.c
index d7e0c4fe02d..7d698f00c09 100644
--- a/drivers/net/phy/phy.c
+++ b/drivers/net/phy/phy.c
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
  #include <linux/delay.h>
  #include <linux/err.h>
  #include <linux/compiler.h>
+#include <dm/uclass-internal.h>
/* Generic PHY support and helper functions */ @@ -927,6 +928,14 @@ struct phy_device *phy_connect(struct mii_dev *bus, int addr,
  {
        struct phy_device *phydev = NULL;
        uint mask = (addr >= 0) ? (1 << addr) : 0xffffffff;
+       struct udevice *phy_dev;
+       int ret;
+
+       /* Skip binding if PHY already bound by eth_phy_binds_nodes(). */
+       ret = uclass_find_device_by_phandle(UCLASS_ETH_PHY, dev,
+                                           "phy-handle", &phy_dev);
+       if (!ret)
+               goto out;
#ifdef CONFIG_PHY_FIXED
        phydev = phy_connect_fixed(bus, dev);
@@ -947,9 +956,13 @@ struct phy_device *phy_connect(struct mii_dev *bus, int 
addr,
                phydev = phy_connect_gmii2rgmii(bus, dev);
  #endif
+out:
        if (!phydev)
                phydev = phy_find_by_mask(bus, mask);
+ if (phydev && !ret && !ofnode_valid(phydev->node))
+               phydev->node = dev_ofnode(phy_dev);
Is the !ret test necessary in this conditional ?

Reply via email to