On May 14, Fabio Estevam wrote: > CAUTION: This email originated from outside of GE HealthCare. Only open links > or attachments if you trust the sender. Report suspicious emails using > Outlook’s “Report” button. > > On Tue, Apr 28, 2026 at 5:51 AM Brian Ruley > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > The LDB clock sources don't have to be the same, so allow DI1 clock to > > be configured separately. > > > > Unlikely to be significant, but the reason will become apparent in the > > following commit. > > > > Signed-off-by: Brian Ruley <[email protected]> > > Once again, this series does not pass CI: > > https://source.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-imx/-/jobs/1450024 > > arm: + kp_imx6q_tpc > +arm-linux-gnueabi-ld: u-boot-spl section `__u_boot_list' will not fit > in region `.sram' > +arm-linux-gnueabi-ld: region `.sram' overflowed by 200 bytes > +arm-linux-gnueabi-ld: drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx6q.o: in function > `imx6q_init_ldb_clks': > +drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx6q.c:271:(.text.imx6q_clk_probe+0x1458): > undefined reference to `select_ldb_di_clock_source' > +make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.xpl:546: spl/u-boot-spl] Error 1 > +make[1]: *** [Makefile:2440: spl/u-boot-spl] Error 2 > +make: *** [Makefile:189: __sub-make] Error 2 > > For v3, please share a URL with a green CI pass; otherwise, I'll need > to ignore it.
Apologies! I honestly did not believe there to be any issues anymore, and at the time I did not have access to the GitLab CI, so I ran some additional tests locally. This was an error of judgement on my part, V3 will have a link to passed CI. Best regards, Brian
