On 5/26/26 10:09, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
From: Peng Fan <[email protected]>

Use dev_read_addr_index() which supports both live device tree and flat DT
backends, avoiding direct dependency on devfdt_* helpers.

While at here, correct the return value check.

No functional changes.

Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <[email protected]>
---
  drivers/pci/pci-rcar-gen2.c | 7 ++++---
  drivers/pci/pci-rcar-gen3.c | 5 +++--
  2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-rcar-gen2.c b/drivers/pci/pci-rcar-gen2.c
index 08d5c4fbb8b..53cb0916741 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pci-rcar-gen2.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/pci-rcar-gen2.c
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
  #include <clk.h>
  #include <dm.h>
  #include <errno.h>
+#include <fdtdec.h>
  #include <pci.h>
  #include <linux/bitops.h>
@@ -235,9 +236,9 @@ static int rcar_gen2_pci_of_to_plat(struct udevice *dev)
  {
        struct rcar_gen2_pci_priv *priv = dev_get_priv(dev);
- priv->cfg_base = devfdt_get_addr_index(dev, 0);
-       priv->mem_base = devfdt_get_addr_index(dev, 1);
-       if (!priv->cfg_base || !priv->mem_base)
+       priv->cfg_base = dev_read_addr_index(dev, 0);
+       priv->mem_base = dev_read_addr_index(dev, 1);
+       if (priv->cfg_base == FDT_ADDR_T_NONE || priv->mem_base == 
FDT_ADDR_T_NONE)
                return -EINVAL;
return 0;
diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-rcar-gen3.c b/drivers/pci/pci-rcar-gen3.c
index d4b4037ce19..1925d968c16 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pci-rcar-gen3.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/pci-rcar-gen3.c
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
  #include <clk.h>
  #include <dm.h>
  #include <errno.h>
+#include <fdtdec.h>
  #include <pci.h>
  #include <wait_bit.h>
  #include <linux/bitops.h>
@@ -391,8 +392,8 @@ static int rcar_gen3_pcie_of_to_plat(struct udevice *dev)
  {
        struct rcar_gen3_pcie_priv *priv = dev_get_plat(dev);
- priv->regs = devfdt_get_addr_index(dev, 0);
-       if (!priv->regs)
+       priv->regs = dev_read_addr_index(dev, 0);
+       if (priv->regs == FDT_ADDR_T_NONE)
                return -EINVAL;
return 0;


Reviewed-by: Neil Armstrong <[email protected]>

Thanks,
Neil

Reply via email to