On May 26, 2026 12:11:06 PM GMT+01:00, Ilias Apalodimas <[email protected]> wrote: >Thanks for the heads up Krzysztof
Hey Ilias, Could you please review the patch "code wise"? I did put the testing I had in patch 1s commit description I know it may not be sufficient enough, but unfortunately my machine isn't the strongest, so sometimes KVM crashes booting u-boot Proof: josh@armbox:~# uname -m aarch64 josh@armbox:~# ls /dev/kvm /dev/kvm josh@armbox:~/contrib/u-boot# qemu-system-aarch64 \ > -machine virt,accel=kvm \ > -cpu host \ > -m 1024 \ > -display none \ > -serial stdio \ > -monitor none \ > -no-reboot \ > -bios build-qemu-arm64/u-boot.bin qemu-system-aarch64: Failed to put registers after init: Invalid argument Note: ^ I did get tcg sort of working + a KVM small test, (for the results) but u-boot doesn't like me :( If you would like to still pursue this, I'll try to build it. And give correct numbers It's fine if you don't. If there is a bug in the diff or if the test coverage is not enough for this path I will take care of it. If you are concerned about authorship, provenance, or how I tested it, please ask me directly what you need for this submission. I get that the U-Boot team wants a tad more oversight here. Id rather be judged on the patch itself, on the basis of the diff and the evidence in this thread, not on history from a different project. [Snip extras! :)] Thanks! :)
