On 6/5/26 7:20 AM, Ilias Apalodimas wrote:
Hello Ilias,
8 * NOTE: This header file defines an interface to U-Boot. Including
9 * this (unmodified) header file in another file is considered normal
10 * use of U-Boot, and does *not* fall under the heading of "derived
11 * work".
Are we certain we are not breaking ABI here ?
That's a good point and I did look at U-Boot briefly when I changed
the location. However, I didn't look at the kernel...
Unfortunately, I don't have a platform I can test. Let's see if Tom's CC helps.
I think it is largely legacy and likely already broken, but at least now
we know why GD/BD split existed in the first place. And it would indeed
be good to find out whether it is still necessary.
--
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
