On Mon, Apr 13, 2026 at 3:36 PM Simon Glass <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Guillaume, > > On Mon, 13 Apr 2026 at 04:48, Guillaume Ranquet > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Sun, 12 Apr 2026 13:37, Simon Glass <[email protected]> wrote: > > >Hi, > > > > > >On Sat, 11 Apr 2026 at 05:25, Heinrich Schuchardt <[email protected]> > > >wrote: > > >> > > >> Am 3. April 2026 16:28:23 MESZ schrieb Guillaume Ranquet > > >> <[email protected]>: > > >> >Implement the cmdline configuration property as described in the spec > > >> >[1] > > >> > > >> > > >> I can't see in the spec that the command line property is x86 specific. > > >> Why would you try to implement it in arch/x86? > > >> > > > > > >This is a little tricky though. It could perhaps be handled in > > >bootm_process_cmdline_env() by setting bootargs. Both legacy bootm and > > >bootstd (via the on_bootargs callback) would then pick it up without > > >any arch-specific code. But I haven't tried it. Commands like > > >'bootflow cmdline set' need to continue to operate as now. > > > > > >Regards, > > >Simon > > > > > > > Indeed, I've looked at implementing this in a generic way but it > > requires a bit of massaging to get things working. > > > > I was also under the impression that no one in their right mind would > > use the command line property if they had access to a device tree? > > > > Tell me if you think I should propose a generic implementation? > > I'm happy with what you have for now, so I'll leave this to Heinrich.
Hi Heinrich, Any feedback on this? Thx, Guillaume. > > Regards, > Simon
