On Fri, Jun 26, 2026 at 08:40:36PM +0200, Quentin Schulz wrote: > Hi Dario, > > On 6/26/26 8:33 PM, Dario Binacchi wrote: > > Coverity reports an INTEGER_OVERFLOW issue because ut_asserteq() compares > > an unsigned int (mmc_dev_num) with ret, which can hold a negative error > > code. > > > > The trick here is that ut_asserteq() takes two arguments and casts both as > unsigned int, hence why it complains. > > If Coverity is happy, I'm happy :) > > This looks fine to me, so: > > Reviewed-by: Quentin Schulz <[email protected]>
Yes, were you able to push this through coverity on your own? -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
