Hi Pranav, On 2026-07-09T14:28:59, Pranav Sanwal <[email protected]> wrote:
> This series improves diagnosability of GPIO offset collisions in the > uclass layer and fixes two related bugs in the gpio-delay driver that > were uncovered while debugging such a collision. Thanks for tracking this down. One thing is missing, though: tests. The gpio-delay driver has no sandbox coverage at all, which is presumably why these bugs went unnoticed. Please can you add a gpio-delay node to the sandbox test devicetree, wrapping at least two GPIO lines, along with a test in test/dm/gpio.c that requests both consumers? That would have caught the offset-propagation bug in patch 3 directly and would also exercise the bounds check and array sizing from patch 2. Regards, Simon
