Hi Marek, Le 06/10/2011 02:13, Marek Vasut a écrit : > This allows the SPL to avoid compiling in the CPU support code. > > Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut<[email protected]> > Cc: Stefano Babic<[email protected]> > Cc: Wolfgang Denk<[email protected]> > Cc: Detlev Zundel<[email protected]> > Cc: Scott Wood<[email protected]> > --- > arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/Makefile | 7 +++++++ > 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/Makefile b/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/Makefile > index 930e0d1..3f9b0f1 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/Makefile > +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/Makefile > @@ -28,6 +28,13 @@ LIB = $(obj)lib$(CPU).o > START = start.o > COBJS = cpu.o > > +ifdef CONFIG_SPL_BUILD > +ifdef CONFIG_SPL_NO_CPU_SUPPORT_CODE > +START := > +COBJS := > +endif > +endif > + > SRCS := $(START:.o=.S) $(SOBJS:.o=.S) $(COBJS:.o=.c) > OBJS := $(addprefix $(obj),$(COBJS) $(SOBJS)) > START := $(addprefix $(obj),$(START))
cpu.c basically contains one cache management function and one linux-boot-related function probably better suited in bootm... Rather than adding a config option to avoid compiling cpu.c, should we not simply move the functions where they belong? Amicalement, -- Albert. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
