> Hi Marek, Hi Detlev,
> > [...] > > > I certainly see your point. Btw. do you feel like help reviewing the PPC > > portion of the patches? That'd be greatly appreciated as I'm not a PPC > > expert. I wanted to avoid resubmission, so I only pushed the new set to > > git://git.denx.de/u-boot- marex.git / debug branch. There is over 50 > > patches now. > > I fear that we have the possibility to loose efforts in communicating > our distrubuted efforts here. If want to ack only a subset of the > patches only available on a git tree, I don't know how to give my > "Acked-By" through the patchwork magic and _not_ add even more work on > your shoulders. On the other hand, the majority of fixes are printf > fixes, so if the compiler does not complain on a MAKEALL any more, I > don't see what other aspect I can evaluate on a "dry review". More like a superset actually. > > Effectively I was hoping that your large patch set stabilizes and > produces no more warnings on a MAKEALL - in this case you have my > > Acked-by: Detlev Zundel <[email protected]> There are a few patches that are not only printf() format patches. And even those printf() format patches deserve proper review. Cheers _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
