On Nov 17, 2011, at 6:40 AM, Stefano Babic wrote: > On 11/16/2011 10:35 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: >> Dear Kumar Gala, >> >> In message <[email protected]> you >> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Please let's try if this works. If you have any suggestions how to >>>> help better, please don't hesitate to tell us. >>> >>> On suggestion I'd have is we improve our use of patchworks. Right now >>> there is way too much 'stale' on patchworks so its difficult to extract >>> what needs to be looked at from what might be owned by existing >>> maintainers. >> >> As a first step this requires someone who is brave enought oclean up >> the existing state, which is indeed a mess. > > Sure, but anyway to avoid conflicts I suggest that who takes care of a > patch *firstly* sets his name as delegate into patchwork before doing > something.
Agreed, my thinking was that for the non-maintained patches, the maintainer that pulls a patch in to their tree would mark themselves as the delegate of the patch. - k _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
