Hi Stefano,
thanks for posting this. There is a couple of comments below.
On 11.12.2011 21:22, Stefano Babic wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_spl_simple.c
> b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_spl_simple.c
> index ed821f2..a3d1af0 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_spl_simple.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_spl_simple.c
> @@ -145,9 +145,9 @@ static int nand_is_bad_block(int block)
> static int nand_read_page(int block, int page, uchar *dst)
> {
> struct nand_chip *this = mtd.priv;
> - u_char *ecc_calc;
> - u_char *ecc_code;
> - u_char *oob_data;
> + u_char ecc_calc[CONFIG_SYS_NAND_ECCSTEPS * CONFIG_SYS_NAND_ECCBYTES];
> + u_char ecc_code[CONFIG_SYS_NAND_ECCTOTAL];
Doesn't ECCTOTAL always equal to ECCSTEPS * ECCBYTES?
> + u_char oob_data[CONFIG_SYS_NAND_OOBSIZE];
I think we can save a few bytes by placing ecc_code and oob_data into a
union. We only need oob_data to get ecc_code...
Regards, Ilya.
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
