Hi Wolfgang, On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 1:44 AM, Wolfgang Denk <w...@denx.de> wrote: > Dear Graeme, > > In message <4f02da64.60...@gmail.com> you wrote: >>
[snip] > One thing comes to mind: it would be nice if we can find a way that > the INIT_FUNC definitions behave similar to "weak" functions - if an > init_func can be redefined / overwritten / modified by board specific > code we eventually have a very nice way to get rid of the related > #ifdef's. Well a lot of the #ifdefs will disappear when the INIT_FUNC macros gets migrated the the corresponding source files as the Makefile logic will take care of things for us I do have in the back of my mind the 'what if' case of the dependencies needing to be different between two arches or boards, but I really can't think of a case where this would be the case. I added the 'post-req' to the macro to allow an init function to be inserted before an existing function which I think will be the most likely case (initialising on-board hardware such as an FPGA prior to timer initialisation for example) We'll see how it pans out Regards, Graeme _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
