On 18/01/2012 17:08, Marek Vasut wrote: > Ok guys, I see ... Stefano, you're ok with putting the reg structures into > these > header files?
The reg structures are already into these header files - the patch moves only the bit meaning inside the imx-regs.h files. We can discuss if we should move them again into the driver, making the decision on which structure to be used not on a SOC level (#ifdef CONFIG_MXxx), but on basis of the controller type (CSPI or ECSPI). This makes sense if we run (we had until now no use case with the currently supported boards) a MX5 board using a CSPI instead of a ECSPI. In this case, we should also transform MXC_CSPI / MXC_ECSPI in a CONFIG_ define to be put in the board configuration file. However, as usual in u-boot, dead code or code that has no use case and cannot be tested is not allowed. Until we have not such a board (MX5 board requiring CSPI instead of ECSPI), we should avoid to introduce not tested code and let those changes for a next patch. Stefano -- ===================================================================== DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: +49-8142-66989-0 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: off...@denx.de ===================================================================== _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
