Hello Heiko, On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 7:39 AM, Heiko Schocher <h...@denx.de> wrote: > Christian Riesch wrote: >> 2) The current version of Sughosh's patch does not change the logic >> behind the LOWLEVEL_INIT defines but just fixes the code to agree with >> ARM's manual. Instead of invalidating the cache it now is flushed. I >> think we should therefore merge his patch (@Tom: Yes, the manual says >> we must do.). The big change that Albert fears was already done >> earlier in commit ca4b55800ed74207c35271bf7335a092d4955416. And while >> we are doing this we also get the comments right. > > What do you mean with commit "ca4b55800ed74207c35271bf7335a092d4955416"? > I could not find it in mainline ...
commit ca4b55800ed74207c35271bf7335a092d4955416 Author: Heiko Schocher <h...@denx.de> Date: Wed Nov 9 20:06:23 2011 +0000 arm, arm926ejs: always do cpu critical inits Regards, Christian _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot