On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 12:51 PM, Wolfgang Denk <w...@denx.de> wrote: > Dear Tom Rini, > > In message > <CA+M6bXnb5k6gA8kbqr0BQ+JLMVFXpzCT+g+dEXfJx307fYn=e...@mail.gmail.com> you > wrote: >> >> > I object against opening this pandora box. >> > >> > If you have so ample resources to run such code, then load a minimal >> > configuration of U-Boot. >> >> Is this a change of heart then? > > No - I never was happy about pulling arbitrary code into SPL. > >> http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/109170 > > I don't see how this is related?
If I follow you right, to my question of "How would a user make use of 'ROM loads next loader via USB' program?" your answer is "Have it load a normal U-Boot that's minimally configured". That link is TI saying "we have split things up such that ROM loads U-Boot-Min (a minimally configured U-Boot) which can then load a full U-Boot". You NAK'd the idea then. Have you changed your mind? If so, where are we going to draw the demarcation between "OK for SPL" and "Must use a full U-Boot" ? -- Tom _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
