On Thursday 26 January 2012 04:21:21 Stefano Babic wrote: > On 26/01/2012 00:40, Joe Hershberger wrote: > >> I have a basic question about your patchset. RFC3927 requires that > >> addresses are continuosly checked to avoid conflicts - this is a strict > >> requirement. > > > > True. It cannot be 100% compliant in every use-case. > > It is important that these limitations are well documented > > > Any time we are processing NetLoop, we will handle conflict correctly. > > Yes, but NetLoop is running only when there some activity on the network.
isn't that the only time that matters ? if we're sitting at the command prompt, then u-boot has the network pretty much shut off (doesn't respond to ARP let alone anything higher). as soon as we try to do network communication, we are compliant again. -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
