On Saturday 14 January 2012 01:45:54 Simon Glass wrote:
> --- a/common/command.c
> +++ b/common/command.c
>
> +int cmd_call(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag, int argc, char * const argv[])
> +{
> + int result;
> +
> + result = (cmdtp->cmd)(cmdtp, flag, argc, argv);
> + if (result)
> + debug("Command failed, result=%d", result);
> + return result;
> +}does a static inline in the header produce the same code size or better ? > --- a/include/command.h > +++ b/include/command.h > > +#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__ > +int cmd_call(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag, int argc, char * const argv[]); > +#endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */ move the prototype up to the rest of the !ASSEMBLY code rather than putting it at the end by itself ? -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
