On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 7:15 AM, Marek Vasut <[email protected]> wrote: >> hi Albert, >> >> On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Albert ARIBAUD >> >> <[email protected]>wrote: >> > Hi all, >> > >> > I just did a ./MAKEALL arm with ELDK42 on the u-boot-arm/master for which >> > I just sent a pull request. >> > >> > The raw result is: >> > >> > --------------------- SUMMARY ---------------------------- >> > Boards compiled: 283 >> > Boards with warnings or errors: 61 ( actux1_4_16 actux1_4_32 actux1_8_16 >> > actux1_8_32 actux2 actux3 actux4 ca9x4_ct_vxp cam_enc_4xx colibri_pxa270 >> > dvlhost efikamx efikasb ethernut5 flea3 harmony hawkboard hawkboard_uart >> > highbank imx27lite imx31_litekit imx31_phycore imx31_phycore_eet >> > km_kirkwood km_kirkwood_pci m28evk magnesium mcx medcom mgcoge3un >> > mt_ventoux mx28evk mx31ads mx31pdk mx35pdk mx51evk mx53ard mx53evk >> > mx53loco mx53smd mx6qarm2 mx6qsabrelite nhk8815 nhk8815_onenand >> > omap1610h2_cs_autoboot omap1610inn_cs_autoboot paz00 pdnb3 plutux portl2 >> > qong scpu seaboard tt01 twister ventana vision2 vpac270_nor_128 >> > vpac270_nor_256 vpac270_ond_256 ) >> > ------------------------------**---------------------------- >> >> <snip> >> >> > The rest: >> > >> > cam_enc_4xx ethernut5 hawkboard hawkboard_uart highbank km_kirkwood >> > km_kirkwood_pci mcx mgcoge3un mt_ventoux omap1610h2_cs_autoboot >> > omap1610inn_cs_autoboot portl2 twister >> > >> > Fail with various causes; I'll send out individual status mails (CC: >> > interested parties) later today. >> >> I pulled in a new u-boot-arm tree, and am able to compile both hawkboard >> and hawkboard_uart fine. I use a 4.6.2 based gcc(arm-none-eabi) and a 2.21 >> binutils. Can you please send me a log of the errors you get for the >> hawkboard. Thanks. > > Can you please try with ELDK 5.1 and ELDK 4.2 ? These are toolchains that the > u- > boot has to be compilable with without errors. If it isn't, there's a problem > in > the code.
I'll grab those as well but we'll have different warnings with toolchains due to the rel.dyn/bss overlap issue that was eventually (apparently) fixed. I don't think any of these (of davinci/omap*/am33xx) are fatal, just warnings. -- Tom _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
