Hi Wolfgang, On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 12:03 PM, Stephen Warren <[email protected]> wrote: > On 03/19/2012 10:59 PM, Simon Glass wrote: >> This reverts commit 295d3942b806552503243f5cfb36aec6f1b5a9bf. >> >> It turns that this really doesn't work very nicely. Instead we should >> have a pre-console panic function so that we know that further execution >> is impossible and we don't need to worry about trampling on UARTs, etc. > > The series: > > Tested-by: Stephen Warren <[email protected]>
If you have concerns with this new approach please sing out. > > For reference, I took u-boot-tegra/master, removed the top 4 commits > that were the previous putc changes, then applied the 5 commits in this > series. > > Tom (assuming everyone else is OK with this series), when you apply this > series, can you put it /before/ the USB/device-tree patches in your > branch, so that there are no points in git history where the USB/DT code > is active, but this code is not. In other words, apply these 5 commits, > then use "git rebase -i" to re-order the patches so this series is > before all the USB/DT changes. Thanks. Regards, Simon _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
