On Sat, Jun 09, 2012 at 11:35:29AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Allen, > > diff --git a/include/configs/tegra20-common-post.h > b/include/configs/tegra20-common-post.h > index b535934..6b046bd 100644 > --- a/include/configs/tegra20-common-post.h > +++ b/include/configs/tegra20-common-post.h > @@ -144,4 +144,69 @@ > TEGRA20_DEVICE_SETTINGS \ > BOOTCMDS_COMMON > > +/* overrides for SPL build here */ > +#ifdef CONFIG_SPL_BUILD > + > +/* remove devicetree support */ > +#ifdef CONFIG_OF_CONTROL > +#undef CONFIG_OF_CONTROL > +#endif > + > +/* remove SERIAL_MULTI */ > +#ifdef CONFIG_SERIAL_MULTI > +#undef CONFIG_SERIAL_MULTI > +#endif > + > +/* remove I2C support */ > +#ifdef CONFIG_TEGRA_I2C > +#undef CONFIG_TEGRA_I2C > +#endif > +#ifdef CONFIG_CMD_I2C > +#undef CONFIG_CMD_I2C > +#endif > > This stuff is pretty ugly - would it not be better to make boards not define > this in the CONFIG_SPL_BUILD case in the first place, rather than overriding > them? As an example, I2C might be useful in SPL, but here it would be hard > (or even uglier) to add.
That's what I had in previous versions of this series, but it seemed even uglier, because it requires sprinkling "#ifndef CONFIG_SPL_BUILD" through each of the tegra20 board configs. -Allen -- nvpublic _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
