On 07/03/2012 02:38 PM, Prafulla Wadaskar wrote: > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Holger Brunck [mailto:holger.bru...@keymile.com] >> Sent: 03 July 2012 18:02 >> To: Prafulla Wadaskar >> Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Valentin Longchamp; >> albert.u.b...@aribaud.net >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/14] arm/km: convert mgcoge3un target to >> km_kirkwood >> >> On 07/03/2012 01:19 PM, Prafulla Wadaskar wrote: >>> >>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Holger Brunck [mailto:holger.bru...@keymile.com] >>>> Sent: 03 July 2012 16:08 >>>> To: Prafulla Wadaskar >>>> Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Valentin Longchamp >>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/14] arm/km: convert mgcoge3un target to >>>> km_kirkwood >>>> >>>> Hi Prafulla, >>>> >>>> On 07/03/2012 10:05 AM, Prafulla Wadaskar wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>> From: Holger Brunck [mailto:holger.bru...@keymile.com] >>>>>> Sent: 13 June 2012 19:03 >>>>>> To: u-boot@lists.denx.de >>>>>> Cc: Holger Brunck; Valentin Longchamp; Prafulla Wadaskar >>>>>> Subject: [PATCH v2 03/14] arm/km: convert mgcoge3un target to >>>>>> km_kirkwood >>>>>> >>>>>> Use the generic header km_kirkwood.h and get rid of the >>>>>> board specific header. >>>>>> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Holger Brunck <holger.bru...@keymile.com> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Valentin Longchamp >> <valentin.longch...@keymile.com> >>>>>> cc: Prafulla Wadaskar <prafu...@marvell.com> >>>>>> --- >>>>>> changes for v2: >>>>>> - rebased because of changes in other patches >>>>>> >>>>>> board/keymile/km_arm/km_arm.c | 9 ++-- >>>>>> boards.cfg | 2 +- >>>>>> include/configs/km_kirkwood.h | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++ >>>>>> include/configs/mgcoge3un.h | 87 --------------------------- >> -- >>>> --- >>>>>> --------- >>>>>> 4 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 93 deletions(-) >>>>>> delete mode 100644 include/configs/mgcoge3un.h >>>>> >>>>> This patch makes sense to me since it since it shrinks overall >> code. >>>>> Doe not have dependency in patch series, can be accepted if >> outside >>>> the series. >>>>> >>>> >>>> again, but there are a lot of dependencies between 01-02 and 03-04 >>>> because all >>>> doing a lot in km_kirkwood.h. So do you have any particular >>>> objections against >>>> the first two patches, beside your input for the kwbimage.cfg which >> I >>>> answered >>>> in a different mail? >>> >>> As I suggested earlier >>> >>> You may have patch series for the bugfixes/improvements to the >> currently supported code. >>> >>> You may have new board support as separate patch, if those have >> dependency, get it addressed first. >>> >>> As such I do not have any objection about longer patch series but >>> Generally having a long patch series requires longer time to be get >> pulled in. >>> >> >> so and when do you think to pull this in? AFAIK we are shortly before >> rc1. And I >> would like to see this in, everything was published before the merge >> window was >> closed and we have reacted on every input you gave. But we can't react >> on inputs >> which are not clearly stated. >> >> So how do we proceed here to get this in for v2012.07? If I summarize >> the >> situation you don't have any particular objections against 01-08 of >> this series. >> So should I resend these eight patches as a standalone serie to get at >> least >> these patches in? > > Yes, Please send the patch series for bug fix and improvements ONLY, I will > pull them ASAP. > > The others we can converge soon. >
But 01-08 are not only bugfixes there are also two new boards in these patches. So will you pull these eight patches in if I post them again without 09-14? Regards Holger _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot