Hi Marek and Mike, > sounds like we should rip all this cache stuff out of common.h and into > > like cache.h so we can document the API expectations. i think Wolfgang > > was against this before, but maybe that was just creating a header for > one > > specific cache macro and not all cache stuff ? > > Certainly this sounds good. We'd also be able to add some nice > instrumentation > while at that, to detect problematic cases with DEBUG enabled or so. The > cache > stuff is starting to get really crazy. > > Best regards, > Marek Vasut >
Since this discussion hasn't been finished, and we haven't decide the final action about the new policy about cache.h and common.h. I'd like to pick this patch v2 for the coming release for fixing build error for board adp-ag102. What do you think? :-) -- Best regards, Macpaul Lin
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
