On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 07:01:19PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote: > Update CONFIG_RAMBOOT and CONFIG_NAND_SPL references to accept CONFIG_SPL > and CONFIG_SPL_BUILD, respectively. CONFIG_NAND_SPL can be removed once > the last mpc85xx nand_spl target is gone. > > CONFIG_RAMBOOT will need to remain for other use cases, but it doesn't > seem right to overload it for meaning SPL as well as nand_spl does. Even > if it's somewhat appropriate for the main u-boot, the SPL itself isn't > (necessarily) ramboot, and we don't have separate configs for SPL and > main u-boot. It was also inconsistent, as other platforms such as > mpc83xx didn't use CONFIG_RAMBOOT in this way. > > Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottw...@freescale.com> > Cc: Andy Fleming <aflem...@gmail.com> [snip] > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/u-boot-spl.lds > b/arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/u-boot-spl.lds > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..372195d > --- /dev/null > +++ b/arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/u-boot-spl.lds > @@ -0,0 +1,81 @@ [snip] > +OUTPUT_ARCH(powerpc) > +SECTIONS
Can we add MEMORY declarations like (some) of the ARM linker scripts do so when we grow beyond the max size it's a link error? -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
