On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 02:37:08PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: [snip] > Later, I wonder whether the concept of a 'current' i2c bus should be > maintained by the command line interpreter, rather than the i2c > system. Because to be honest, most of the drivers I see have to save > the current bus number, set the current bus, do the operation, then > set the bus back how they found it (to preserve whatever the user > things is the current bus).
I agree. Lets move the notion of "current" to cmd_i2c and make everything internally pass around the bus to operate on. Or try going down this path and find a fatal problem :) -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
