Dear Simon Glass, > Hi Wolfgang, > > On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 8:29 AM, Wolfgang Denk <w...@denx.de> wrote: > > Dear Simon Glass, > > > > In message <1351902453-27956-18-git-send-email-...@chromium.org> you wrote: > >> From: Luigi Semenzato <semenz...@chromium.org> > >> > >> Add a simple command to stress-test a TPM (Trusted Platform Module). > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Luigi Semenzato <semenz...@chromium.org> > >> > >> Commit-Ready: Stefan Reinauer <reina...@google.com> > >> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> > >> --- > >> > >> common/cmd_tpm.c | 93 > >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- 1 files changed, > >> 87 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > > > See previous comments about TPM code. Please let's dump all this > > unused stuff. > > As mentioned, patches are pending to enable this for two boards (ARM and > x86).
Hm, does this TPM argument still go on? Actually, my position is I'd be all for dumping it right away (I even posted a patch some time ago), if it wasn't for SJG posting patches adding another TPM chip. Moreover, now I see there are patches for cmd_tpm.c . So I see a lot of effort invested into doing the TPM right. What is the actual problem with keeping this code in our codebase and patching it then? It's all used now, problem solved, or am I missing something? Best regards, Marek Vasut _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
