On 7/24/2026 8:34 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote: > Caution: This is an external email. Please take care when clicking links or > opening attachments. When in doubt, report the message using the 'Report this > email' button > > > Hi Joseph, > > On Fri, Jul 24, 2026 at 3:50 AM Joseph Guo <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> Please help upstream the alias and bootph-pre-ram properties in the kernel. >>> >> >> The alias only works on u-boot stage. Can you explain why this should be >> upstream to kernel? Thanks. > > This is not a blocker, and I can accept this u-boot.dtsi for now, but > we try to keep u-boot.dtsi as minimal as possible. > > The bootph- properties are accepted upstream. Take a look at this > commit, for example: > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?h=next-20260723&id=06d40112780e79631537496f37958087ce2704f7 > > If you can help to upstream these bootph- properties, that would be great.
Hi Fabio, Sure I understand the bootph- properties are accepted upstream. I'm happy to upstream them. I prefer to keep the alias into u-boot.dtsi because only u-boot read that alias to assgin the fixed sequence to netc PCI host controller. It is no needed by kernel. Is it okay for you? -- Best Regards, Joseph
