Hi Johan,

On 2026-07-28T06:51:38, Johan Jonker <[email protected]> wrote:
> rockchip: doc: change TPL phrase
>
> The TPL phrase in rockchip.rst has some spelling and logical
> problems. Rewrite and add missing structure by changing to a
> list view to better separate the 2 choices the user has to make.
>
> Signed-off-by: Johan Jonker <[email protected]>
>
> doc/board/rockchip/rockchip.rst | 8 +++++---
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

> diff --git a/doc/board/rockchip/rockchip.rst b/doc/board/rockchip/rockchip.rst
> @@ -217,9 +217,11 @@ For SoCs whose TF-A code is not available as open 
> source, use BL31 binary provid
> +* For SoCs without U-Boot sources to initialize DRAM use the DDR binary 
> provided
> +  by the Rockchip rkbin repository as ROCKCHIP_TPL when building U-Boot 
> follow
> +  :ref:`PackageWithRockchipMiniloader`.

how about: when building U-Boot, then follow

The first bullet reads better with a comma too ('...to initialize
DRAM, follow ...'). What do you think?

Regards,
Simon

Reply via email to