Hi Simon, On Tue, Aug 4, 2026 at 5:05 PM Simon Glass <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Alexey, > > On 2026-07-31T17:10:44, Alexey Charkov <[email protected]> wrote: > > binman: tests: Add test coverage for a FIT with embedded Linux+initrd and > > /chosen > ... > > > This has been tested with an uncompressed ARM64 Image as the payload, as > > well as with a GZip-compressed one (using existing SPL_GZIP functionality) > > Just to check - is there any test coverage for the SPL side (the > atf/UFS/Falcon-decision changes in patches 1-3), or is that all > board-level? A sandbox_spl test for the caching behaviour in patch 1 > would be nice if feasible, since that is generic code.
Oof. I'll need to check what the sandbox SPL implementation can do. The whole Falcon thing is quite SoC specific. Let me give it a try. Best regards, Alexey
