On 8/5/26 9:30 AM, Patrice CHOTARD wrote: Hello Patrice,
Agree with your analysis, i will send a fix to exit from cyclic_run() in case the next cyclic timestamp is not reached. But, in parallel, to gain more reactivity, schedule() can also be moved at the same level of ctrcl() as this patch is proposing. Thanks PatriceHi Marek Is it OK for you to merge this patch ?
Is this series still necessary with the cyclic fixes in place ?
