On 8/5/26 9:30 AM, Patrice CHOTARD wrote:

Hello Patrice,

Agree with your analysis, i will send a fix to exit from cyclic_run() in case 
the next cyclic timestamp is not reached.
But, in parallel, to gain more reactivity, schedule() can also be moved at the 
same level of ctrcl() as this patch is proposing.

Thanks
Patrice

Hi Marek

Is it OK for you to merge this patch ?
Is this series still necessary with the cyclic fixes in place ?

Reply via email to