On 8/12/26 19:51, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 8/12/26 3:33 PM, Michal Simek wrote:

Before
$ ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl -f arch/arm/mach-versal2/
Tom Rini <[email protected]> (maintainer:ARM)
Ilias Apalodimas <[email protected]> (maintainer:ARM)
Michal Simek <[email protected]> (maintainer:ARM VERSAL,commit_signer:14/15=93%,authored:10/15=67%)
There ^ you are , what's the problem ?

Yes, I'm listed - but under ARM VERSAL, which is a different SoC family.
Versal Gen 2 is a completely different chip with different features.
It only matches the ARM VERSAL entry because of the "versal" substring in
the N: regex, not because they're the same chips. (FWIW keeping "Versal"
in every new SoC name is very confusing).

Also Gen 2 specific drivers/files are coming, and those should be attributed to the Versal Gen 2 not to the Versal. Creating the section now is what makes that correct - otherwise every new Versal2 file silently inherits the Versal.

Why do we need 4 or 5 MAINTAINERS entries for Xilinx platforms, with the same maintainer, same git tree, same status, in the first place ? Why not have one XILINX entry that covers it all ?

No issue. Let me prepare a patch for it.

Thanks,
Michal

Reply via email to