On 26-08-19 13:43:26, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> Hi Petko,
> 
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2026 at 12:30 PM Petko Manolov
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Petko Manolov <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm/dts/Makefile                         |   3 +
> >  arch/arm/dts/imx6dl-draeger-m48.dts           |  24 ++
> >  arch/arm/dts/imx6q-draeger-m48.dts            |  24 ++
> >  arch/arm/dts/imx6qdl-draeger-m48-u-boot.dtsi  |  20 +
> >  arch/arm/dts/imx6qdl-draeger-m48.dtsi         | 369 ++++++++++++++++++
> >  arch/arm/dts/imx6qp-draeger-m48.dts           |  78 ++++
> 
> Sorry if I wasn't clear, but what I meant in my previous comment is that you
> need to upstream these DTS to Linux first.

Unfortunately this board runs QNX, not Linux, so upstreaming them doesn't make
sense.

> That's where the real DTS review happens. Make sure the new devicetree files
> pass dt-schema validation.
> 
> You should send the i.MX and SoCFPGA patches separately to the Linux folks for
> review.
> 
> In U-Boot, we want to use the DTS directly from the upstream Linux repo.

Can i use some sort of DT validation tool that pass kernel's requirements?


                Petko

Reply via email to