On 7/2/26 15:08, Bastien Curutchet wrote:
From: "Miquel Raynal (DAVE.eu)" <[email protected]>
If there is no indication about 16b buswidth, no need to fail the probe,
just assume it is the (very standard) 8b case.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal (DAVE.eu) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Bastien Curutchet (DAVE.eu) <[email protected]>
---
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/zynq_nand.c | 6 ------
1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/zynq_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/zynq_nand.c
index 54c25563072..be080cbb074 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/zynq_nand.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/zynq_nand.c
@@ -1134,12 +1134,6 @@ static int zynq_nand_probe(struct udevice *dev)
nand_chip->write_buf = zynq_nand_write_buf;
is_16bit_bw = zynq_nand_check_is_16bit_bw_flash();
- if (is_16bit_bw == NAND_BW_UNKNOWN) {
- printf("%s: Unable detect NAND based on MIO settings\n",
- __func__);
- return -EINVAL;
- }
-
But why is there a failure in the first place?
M
