On Thu, Aug 27, 2026 at 04:43:06PM +0200, Markus Schneider-Pargmann wrote:
> Hi Heinrich,
> 
> On Thu Aug 27, 2026 at 2:49 PM CEST, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> > On 8/27/26 14:36, Markus Schneider-Pargmann (TI) wrote:
> >> clk_set_default_parents() already ignores -ENOSYS from clk_set_parent().
> >> Do the same for clk_set_default_rates() and rely on the earlier setup
> >> clock rates.
> >> 
> >> On am437x the cpsw switch has assigned-clock-rates for the RGMII clock.
> >> The divider delegates to a multiplier of the DPLL that has no set_rate
> >> and no delegation, so it returns -ENOSYS.
> >> 
> >> Signed-off-by: Markus Schneider-Pargmann (TI) <[email protected]>
> >> ---
> >>   drivers/clk/clk-uclass.c | 9 +++++++++
> >>   1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> >> 
> >> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-uclass.c b/drivers/clk/clk-uclass.c
> >> index c33f415917e9..0069ce9a8875 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/clk/clk-uclass.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-uclass.c
> >> @@ -359,6 +359,15 @@ static int clk_set_default_rates(struct udevice *dev,
> >>   
> >>            ret = clk_set_rate(c, rates[index]);
> >>   
> >> +          /*
> >> +           * Not all drivers/clocks support setting the rate (as of now).
> >> +           * Ignore that and keep the rate set by an earlier boot stage.
> >> +           */
> >> +          if (ret == -ENOSYS) {
> >
> > In include struct clk_ops is incompletely documented.
> >
> > It is undefined which error code might indicate what.
> > This might be handled differently in different drivers.
> 
> Thanks for your feedback! This patch is more about handling what
> clk_set_rate() returns than what the clk drivers return in set_rate().
> clk_set_rate() itself has a check if CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is unset and
> returns -ENOSYS otherwise if it couldn't find a suitable set_rate:
> 
>       /* Try to find parents which can set rate */
>       while (!ops->set_rate) {
>               ...
>               if (!(clkp->flags & CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT))
>                       return -ENOSYS;
>               ...
>       }
> 
> >
> > E.g. zynq_clk_set_rate() returns ENXIO if there is no set rate 
> > functionality.
> >
> > Please, complete the description of struct clk_ops, check what all clock 
> > drivers do, and harmonize the return codes before adding this change.
> >
> > The struct clk_ops documentation should explicitly mention how error 
> > codes are handled by the uclass.
> 
> set_rate is also already documented in clk-uclass.h:
> 
>   /**
>    * set_rate() - Set current clock rate.
>    * @clk:    The clock to manipulate.
>    * @rate:   New clock rate in Hz.
>    ...
>    * Return:
>    * * The new rate on success
>    * * -%ENOSYS if this function is not implemented for @clk
>    * * -%ENOENT if @clk->id is invalid. Prefer using an assert instead, and 
> doing
>    *   this check in request().
>    * * -%EINVAL if @rate is not valid for @clk.
>    * * Another negative error value (such as %EIO or %ECOMM) if the rate could
>    *   not be set due to a bus error.
>    */
>   ulong set_rate(struct clk *clk, ulong rate);

Does this answer your concerns / questions, Heinrich? I believe this
patch is required for another series, which is in turn required to move
the am43xx platforms to OF_UPSTREAM. Thanks!

-- 
Tom

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to