On Sun, Oct 18, 2026 at 03:32:57AM +0800, Kuan-Wei Chiu wrote: > On Sun, Oct 18, 2026 at 03:13:46AM +0800, Kuan-Wei Chiu wrote: > > > + /* > > > + * Give up on any error: after a timeout the request is still > > > + * on the virtqueue, so a later response could be mismatched. > > > + */ > > I guess your LLM added this comment while fixing my review comment? > I don't really see why we need a comment here. Even if we ignore the > virtqueue timeout mismatch issue, we already abort immediately on any > other error anyway. It looks like a standard and normal error handling > to me, so why is it special to need a comment here?
Yes. I used AI tools to assist with this work. I reviewed every line and tested it on QEMU and sandbox. You're right that this is just normal error handling, so I'll drop the comment in v4. I'll remove overly long comments and descriptions in the future. Thanks for the careful review.
