Thank-you for the comments, Warren. They do already use UniDebugger with DynamicConnect. CDS
> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Warren Haroldson > Sent: Friday, May 14, 2004 11:57 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [U2] [wIinteg/DC] why should pgmrs want > wIntegrate over DynamicConnect? > > > Your programmers should be looking at UniDebugger. It is a > good GUI editor for basic programs (or anything else) with > syntax highlighting and it has debugging tools. The best > thing is it's free and comes on the client disk with Dynamic > Connect. Wintegrate also has a good GUI editor, > upload/download capabilities, and a scripting language that > has MV capabilities. HTH > > Warren Haroldson > > -----Original Message----- > From: Stevenson, Charles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, May 14, 2004 11:08 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [U2] [wIinteg/DC] why should pgmrs want wIntegrate > over DynamicConnect? > > Our programmers use DynamicConnect. They seem satisfied, but > is there any personal benefit to them to upgrade to wIntegrate? > > Now, I'm ONLY talking about UniVerse PROGRAMMERS. Our general > users interact with UV in a variety of non-telnet ways. > Those with telnet sessions generally use an established > company-standard term emulator, GLink, which they also use > to connect to for a variety of other non-Universe platforms. > Although we could theoretically leverage wIntegrate's > UV-awareness in our ap, deploying it to users is not up for grabs. > > Programmers might benefit from it, though. That's what I am > wondering. I haven't used wIntegrate for years, so can't > compare the two. > > > Chuck Stevenson > ------- > u2-users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.u2ug.org/listinfo/u2-users > ------- > u2-users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.u2ug.org/listinfo/u2-users ------- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.u2ug.org/listinfo/u2-users
