TIMEACCURACY didn't work for me either. I've reported it to IBM. ----- Original Message ----- From: "HENDERSON MICHAEL MR" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 8:43 PM Subject: Unclassified RE: [U2] [UV] TIME() precision on UV 10.1
> John, > > Your 9.6 system was HP-UX, right? > The change came at 10.0.4 IIRC, and brings HP-UX in line with all the other > ports. > Check the list archives, there have been two or three discussions on this in > the last twelve months or so. > > I _think_ you'll have to put a "$OPTIONS TIME.MILLISECOND" into every > program unit whose behaviour you want to change (and re-compile of course). > > > HTH > > Mike > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Hester > Sent: Wednesday, 12 May 2004 12:02 > To: U2 Users Discussion List > Subject: [U2] [UV] TIME() precision on UV 10.1 > > I'm working on an upgrade from UV 9.6 to 10.1 and need TIME() to behave as > it used to for backward compatibility. UV 10.1 is running on RedHat EL 3.0. > I changed TIMEACCURACY to 0 in uvconfig and executed uvregen, but TIME() is > still showing milliseconds instead of whole seconds. What am I missing? > > TIA, > John > ------- > u2-users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.u2ug.org/listinfo/u2-users > > The information contained in this Internet Email message is intended > for the addressee only and may contain privileged information, but not > necessarily the official views or opinions of the New Zealand Defence Force. > If you are not the intended recipient you must not use, disclose, copy or > distribute this message or the information in it. > > If you have received this message in error, please Email or telephone > the sender immediately. > ------- > u2-users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.u2ug.org/listinfo/u2-users ------- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.u2ug.org/listinfo/u2-users
