Mike The presentation point...
> * Connection pooling for UO.NET provides good scalability sounds like it could be sales guys and tech guys not talking properly. Maybe the engineer said that dot net has object pooling built in, and the presentation morphed that to UO.NET having connection pooling. Then again who knows where they got the performance monitor from. And... > * Modeled [sic] after UniObjects For Java with vast improvement ... what does that 'vast' mean? It looks almost identical to UOJ to me. The MSDN page I linked to was for the object pooling class - which should allow one to pool UniSessions with a few tens of lines of code. If its taken IBM this long to dot net UO anyway, then I personally am thankful they didn't try to add anything new. Maybe built-in connection pooling (and an ado provider) is their next plan. Simon "HENDERSON MICHAEL MR" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sorry, Simon, but I fail to see the relevance of that MSDN article. > > Under > "ms-help://MS.MSDNQTR.2004JUL.1033/dnbda/html/daag.htm#daag_managingdata > baseconnections" in the July 04 MSDN DVD, there is a section that deals > with connection pooling and says > "ADO.NET data providers provide transparent connection pooling, the > exact mechanics of which vary for each provider. This section discusses > connection pooling in relation to: > The SQL Server .NET Data Provider > The Oracle .NET Data Provider > The OLE DB .NET Data Provider > The ODBC .NET Data Provider " > > I was hoping that the UO.NET Developer's Guide would contain similar > information in respect to UO.NET. > > > The presentation at last year's IBM DB2 Data management conference > included (at slide 21) this feature list > "UniObjects For .NET ... > * 100% Managed Code, written in C# > * Connection pooling for UO.NET provides good scalability > * Modeled [sic] after UniObjects For Java with vast improvement > * Performance monitor for Connection Pooling > * Standard Logging/Tracing for better troubleshooting" > > The UO.NET Developer's Guide addresses the first, third and fifth > points, but does not seem to mention the second and fourth at all. > > Hope this clarifies my point. > > Mike ------- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
