Yes, we have been developing an entirely new product with UO.NET and UV since June. Mostly it has worked quite well, but we have hit a few snags.
With the beta version of uodotnet.dll we had a problem with the GetArg or getArgDynArray methods on one particular UniSubroutine object. It would sometimes return garbage values for higher argument numbers (above 5 or 6), or cause an abort with a message about "possible client-side licensing problem." The orkaround was to reduce the number of arguments. (We combined several single-valued arguments into a dynamic array.) With build 1.1.7073.0 (first released build dated 7-Aug-04), we had these problems: (1) LockRecord method of UniFile class raises exception if record not found. But if executed twice, it does NOT raise the exception the second time even though the record is still not found. IMO, it should not raise an exception, but I would be happy with any consistent behavior. (2) The UniVerse basic statement "DEL ATC<1>" causes UO.NET to abort when ATC is an empty string passed in to the subroutine as an argument. It is a UniDynArray object in .NET. This happened every time in one particular case, but it not occur with other subroutines when they were passed an empty dynamic array. (3) The UniVerse basic statement"aMsg<-1>=Variable" causes UO.NET to abort when aMsg is passed and it is an empty string. Again, this happened every time in one particular case, but not elsewhere. My workaround for both (2) and (3) has been to insert a statement like IF ATC="" THEN ATC="" for any argument passed into a basic subroutine from .NET where it might possibly be an empty string. Yesterday, I installed build 1.1.1.0 dated 7-Oct-04 which patches a performance issue (not one that we have experienced) with code like (example from Wally Terhune at IBM U2 ATS): uonetCMD.Command = "SSELECT CLIENTS" uonetCMD.Execute() uoSelectlist = uonetSession.CreateUniSelectList(0) Do While Not uoSelectlist.LastRecordRead itemid = uoSelectlist.Next Loop So far, no new problems with this build. I have not checked the issues with prior builds to see if they are resolved in this new build. HTH... Regards, Steve Johnson Technology Director FXA Group Ltd. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Tabor Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2004 9:44 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [U2] Has anyone tried UniObjects for .NET? Hi, Just wondering if anyone has had a chance to try then new UniObjects for .NET? If so: What are your thoughts pro & con? Any bugs to keep in mind? Anything else? Thanks in advance! - Dave ------- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ ------- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
